Defending the family

Share on MeWe Share on Gab E-mail article

Mark Clayton Says Tennessee Registry of Election Finance Violates Civil Rights Act of 1871 Klu Klux Klan Act

For Immediate Release May 23 2022 2PM EST

Permission Granted in Advance to Use In any Manner.

THIS NEWS RELEASE IS POSTED AT CHRISTIAN NEWS WIRE

Phone:

Email:

Mark Clayton Says Tennessee Registry of Election Finance Violates Civil Rights Act of 1871 Klu Klux Klan Act

Klu Klux Klan Act of 1871

Civil Rights Act of 1964

REACTION OF MARK CLAYTON TO YESTERDAY'S FALSE ACCUSATION OF A THREAT
TO THE REGISTRY BOARD IN NASHVILLE

FULL NEWS CONFERENCE VIA TENNESSEE REPORT TV (2012) ON MARK CLAYTON WINNING DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRIMARY WITH SUPPORT FROM 48,000 VOTERS

PHOTO CREDIT: NASHVILLE COUNCILMAN JOHNATHAN HALL (LEFT) AND MARK CLAYTON (RIGHT) FOLLOWING HEARING IN NASHVILLE.

Public Advocate president Eugene Delgaudio issued, president of Public Advocate says:

QUOTE

NASHVILLE, Tennessee

At yesterday's (Wednesday, May 18, 2022) Johnathan Hall hearing, individual state actors acting under color of law as the Tennessee Registry Board of Election Finance seemed to conspire to create a false political theater and clearly publicly ambushed Mark Clayton in order to make false accusations of criminal behavior against Mark Clayton, and unfortunately did this political ambush during an official proceeding under color of law.

In lay terms, a white spokesman presenting an emotional but sincere defense of a much attacked conservative black office holder was thrown out of a proceeding without real cause.


The prosecutor seems to be using the registry to punish a witness for Mark Clayton and create a chilling effect on 30 other named witnesses in State v Clayton which Mark Clayton defeated, in court, Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk's entire office by having the Judge dismiss the entire case.

At the hearing, these state actors at the Registry board were told by Mark Clayton he is a key witness, in the cited Johnathan Hall case on their public agenda, is an interested party, and an on the record Interpleader party to the Johnathan Hall case.

While he was speaking Clayton also asserted that the entire office of the prosecutor is already disqualified under court rules to prosecute Clayton and is also disqualified from prosecuting Johnathan Hall for revenge.

(see Affidavit of Mark Clayton Regarding DA Glenn Funk)


Mark Clayton already won this issue in State v. Clayton and the Registry has no authority to overturn this.


In contradiction to their statements during the official proceeding, while talking to the press afterwards, the Registry Chair and staff backpedeled and seemed to know that Mark Clayton had made no serious threats but yet make reference to "man who called yesterday with threatening accusations".

It is the stated position of Mark Clayton:

"Had any threat truly been made by anyone, the state trooper would have arrested that person at the door merely upon probable cause. This did not happen because I did not make any threats. For the state actors of the Tennessee Board of Election Finance to have perjured in an official proceeding, which is on recording, that Mark Clayton made any threat is a bald-faced lie, a tort, and a crime. I object to this ruling of the chair. The damage is done. Now they must face justice."

Statement of Facts About Phone Call

The state actors received one phone call the day before the meeting and were put on notice that Mark Clayton would only appear as a witness, adverse to the State, and also as an interested party.

Assertion of Standing by Mark Clayton
This was the Assertion the Members of the Registry Did not want revealed.


Clayton said: "Johnathan Hall is in my witness list in litigation where I defeated, in court, Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk and made sworn accusations against Glenn Funk's Department. Glenn Funk's open file policy does not constitute Brady Rule Compliance, and GlennFunk should be disbarred for intentionally failing to institute any Brady policy in his office. "


ANY CONTEMPLATED OR ANNOUNCED VOTE ON JOHNATHAN HALL IS NULL AND VOID

Delgaudio said: "CLAYTON is a successful complaintant in an unrelated case involving the prosecutor, and Clayton's key witness is the much maligned Johnathan Hall who is the subject of the hearing. Clayton attempted to bring this conflict of interest to the parties yesterday. Instead they silenced Clayton in a clear attempt to push aside the allegation that the board appeared to be used improperly to interfere in an unrelated case by persecuting Hall at the behest of the prosecutor who falsely made allegations against Clayton in another case and lost."

The case was State v Clayton, which resulted in a dismisal, December 3, 2021, with the Judge throwing the case out with no merit, Davidson County Criminal Court. Glen Funk has sour grapes and a thin skin. Clayton alledged violations of the Klu Klux Klan act by Funk in a sworn affidavit.

Councilman Johnathan Hall is a witness in the successful dismisal of charges against Clayton.

In summary, Mark Clayton views the origins of the case against Hall as a political vendetta or payback by the prosecutor for losing to Clayton and due to the critical testimony of Councilman Jonathan Hall in that dismissed case which the Judge refused to even allow to go to a jury.


These conflicts of interest must be disclosed, noted and legally responded to on the record as they involve federal, state and local laws, protocols and practices.

Clayton says "The fine against Jonathan Hall is unenforceable 1) because all interested parties and witnesses did not have the opportunity to be heard and present evidence and 2) the board made no findings of fact and conclusions of law."

Clayton says "the only relief possible is to cease and desist to ANY state actor or agent of said actor who attempts to enforce the $360,000 fine against Jonathan Hall as it can be reasonably considered to intimidate and coerce my witness and to create a chilling effect for other witnesses in my victory over Glenn Funk and other private litigation."

UNQUOTE

PREVIOUS LEGAL ACTIONS TAKEN BY MARK CLAYTON TO PROTECT CIVIL RIGHTS OF BLACK CANDIDATES FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

(2020)

Mass Media Ignores Purge of Black Candidates from Tennessee Ballot

(2018) Tennesee Judge Order: Public Advocate V P Mark Clayton Protects Minorities In Memphis Against Liberals' Bigotry

MARK CLAYTON DEMANDED IMMEDIATE RESIGNATION OF CORRUPT (former) MAYOR MEGAN BARRY (2018)

MISCELANIOUS: VIDEO RESPONSE FROM MARK CLAYTON. "LIBERALS HATE CLAYTON GOT 48,000 VOTES IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY TO WIN STATEWIDE NOMINATION FOR U.S. SENATE." (2012)

MARK CLAYTON RECEIVED 706,000 VOTES STATEWIDE FOR US SENATOR IN TENNESSEE GENERAL ELECTION. (2012, LINK)