Share on MeWe Share on Gab E-mail article

Public Advocate VP Mark Clayton Demands Criminal Investigation Into Nashville Public Corruption

Photo Credit: Instagram Post of I'AesHea Myles and Megan Barry Endorsement

Mark Clayton, Vice President of Public Advocate formally requests the appropriate authorities review certain matters related to the integrity of public and electoral processes in Nashville, Tennessee.

Background

On February 1, 2018, I issued a public statement recommending the resignation of then-Nashville Mayor Megan Barry and calling for a review of her management of public funds and her use of office. In that communication, I expressed concern over the diversion of flood water affecting my property, which I believed merited further examination. Subsequent legal proceedings in connection with that matter were resolved through the judicial process.

Current Concerns

  1. Circumstances Affecting My Property:
    There are indications in the public record that actions associated with I'Aeshea Myles, a public official and former candidate for the chancellorship (seat on Nashville Court), may be connected to the diversion of flood water that has adversely affected my property. I respectfully request that an investigation be undertaken to determine the facts surrounding these events and to assess whether any departures from proper procedure occurred.

  2. Electoral Process Issues:
    I am also concerned about the process by which Johnny Ellis was removed from the ballot in the election for chancery judge. Given that the regulation of elections is a state responsibility, I request that the method and legal basis for this candidate removal be thoroughly reviewed. It is my belief that a careful examination under the public function test-as established in cases such as Chapman v. Higbee Co.-will help clarify whether the procedures followed were in full compliance with the law and whether voters' rights were fully preserved.

  3. Potential Conflicts of Interest and Ethical Considerations:
    Additionally, I wish to draw attention to certain issues regarding the conduct of Attorney Johnny Ellis. In light of concerns related to simultaneous representation in interconnected legal matters and the potential for conflicts of interest under Tennessee Code Annotated §§ 23-3-105 and 23-3-107, I request that his involvement be subject to an independent review to confirm adherence to established ethical and legal standards.

Requests

  • Investigation of Property-Related Concerns:
    I ask that the circumstances regarding the diversion of flood water-especially those potentially connected to I'Aeshea Myles-be examined in detail, with attention to whether any actions may have deviated from accepted legal procedures.

  • Review of Electoral Procedures:
    I request a comprehensive review of the candidate removal process involving Johnny Ellis. Such an inquiry should assess the legal basis for the removal, determine whether all steps complied with state regulations, and ensure that voters' rights were maintained.

  • Examination of Professional Conduct:
    I further request that any matters regarding potential conflicts of interest or ethical concerns-specifically involving Attorney Johnny Ellis-be independently investigated, with full consideration given to the applicable statutory standards.

  • Opportunity to Present Evidence:
    I respectfully request that all relevant facts and documents be submitted to a grand jury, and that I be granted the opportunity to present further information and exhibits that may assist in clarifying these matters.

I am prepared to provide additional documentation or evidence as needed to support a full and impartial review of the issues described herein. Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Mark Clayton
Vice President, Public Advocate

links:

ORIGINAL VIDEO POST SIX YEARS AGO THAT BEGAN THIS WHOLE SAGA

Attachment: Public Advocate Statement, February 1, 2018 (Note: Article was reposted with a new date to discuss the applicability of the Tennessee AG opinion as persuasive authority for the state of Georgia to adopt regarding the misuse of funds - article is for educational use regarding misuse of public funds and the potential criminal penalties for public officials who do so).