SICKO TWITTER CENSOR YOEL ROTH CRIES-- "WE ARE DESTROYED BY PUBLIC ADVOCATE LAWSUIT"
Eugene Delgaudio president of the non-profit non-partisan Public Advocate said: it is extremely statisfying to me that my supporters joined me in destroying this nasty perverted twitter troll who abused so many conservatives during his tyranical reign of censorship through a legal brief that upheld our view that collaboration between social media giants and the federal government is illegal. This Yoel Roth is a crybaby and credits Republicans but as a non-partisan group, we helped brought an end to his empire of evil for all Americans. "
The top architects of the west's social media censorship regime continue to complain about the success of the ongoing pushback against their industry, spearheaded by GOP congressional investigations and the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit.
A clip that circulated on X, formerly known as Twitter, shows the former top censor of that platform, Yoel Roth, complaining that the "disinformation researchers," whose work often provided the basis for the suppression of Republican and conservative voices online, have been forced onto the defensive by GOP efforts.
Roth, who as head of Twitter's "trust and safety" department presided over the platform's vast censorship apparatus, complained that disinformation researchers were now being "silenced" by Republican lawsuits.
"We've stopped having a conversation about the facts. We've stopped having a debate about which ideas are good, which ideas are bad. We've entered this phase where silencing people has become the de facto way to advance your interests," said Roth, " reports Breitbart.
DETAILS OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE LEGAL EFFORT TO DEFEND FIRST AMENDMENT FOR ALL AMERICANS
Back in September, the Fifth Circuit just issued its decision in Missouri v. Biden . The Court upheld but narrowed the key provisions of the District Court injunction against the most oppressive government defendants -- the White House, CDC and FBI, while letting off the hook NIAID, CISA, and the State Department because of insufficient evidence. The scope of the injunction was narrowed to banning communications which were "threatening, pressuring, or coercing" social media companies.
There was only one footnote that referred to amicus briefs, likely including our amicus brief -- "Plaintiffs and several amici assert that the FBI and other federal actors coerced or significantly encouraged the social-media companies into disseminating information that was favorable to the administration-information the federal officials knew was false or misleading. We express no opinion on those assertions because they are not necessary to our holding here."
The court relied to some degree on the Second Circuit decision in NRA v Vullo, which Public Advocate and Amici, addressed in an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to grant cert, as well as the Ninth Circuit's decision in O'Handley v. Weber, where Public Advocate also supported SCOTUS review.
The panel decision was per curiam from a panel including: Judges Clement and Elrod who were appointed by George W Bush and Judge Willett who was appointed by Donald J. Trump.
"All in all, this was a nice win. Congratulations to William Olson and his team for their brilliant work. This decision will really annoy the Biden Administration and all the censor tyrants," said Eugene Delgaudio, president of Public Advocate.