Defending the family

Share on MeWe Share on Gab E-mail article

A Bonhoeffer moment: Evangelical leaders vow civil disobedience if Supreme Court redefines marriage

LifeSite News Reports:

Dozens of Christian leaders have vowed they will not remain silent, as they did following the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision, promising to take nonviolent direct action if the High Court votes to redefine marriage.

The Supreme Court is deciding two separate issues: Whether the 14th Amendment guarantees same-sex "marriage" as a constitutional right, and whether states must honor same-sex "marriages" contracted in states that have voted - or, more likely, where an unelected judge has forcibly determined - to redefine marriage.

"We believe that the majority of the Court will rule in favor of elevating what we have always taught to be a sinful lifestyle to the stature of a civil right - forcing us to choose between their ruling and our religious convictions that are based on Scripture," said Rick Scarborough, a former Southern Baptist minister who now heads Vision America Action. "Christians are being declared the lawbreakers when we are simply living by what we have always believed and by a set of laws that the culture historically has agreed to."

Others on the call affirmed his urgency. "This is Roe v. Wade all over again. I am standing shoulder to shoulder with all who will stand up for God's Word concerning marriage," said Dr. James Dobson, the founder of Family Talk Radio. "To the extent that I am able to influence anybody, I will do it with passion."

A Supreme Court decision, following a string of lower court rulings that struck down democratically enacted amendments protecting marriage as the union of one man and one woman, would further fracture society and restrict the free exercise of religion, participants in the call warned.

The ruling follows an ongoing controversy over whether states like Indiana and Arkansas should adopt state versions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a Clinton-era federal act aimed at preserving private citizens' First Amendment rights.

"Roe v. Wade was a time when the church should have said no, regardless of what seven Supreme Court justices said," Staver told the call. "The difference is Roe was a wrong decision that resulted in a loss of life - but people were not forced to participate. With this issue, people will be forced to participate and affirm it. It will affect licenses for counselors, attorney disciplines, and every licensing profession will be affected."

Christian critics have said for decades that homosexual activists and pressure groups sought to channel the power of the state to affirm the morality of their actions. Nor are they alone in their critique.

Churches would face civil rights litigation and "have the same issues with tax exemption over sexual preference as you have now over race."

Read More: