PA agrees with this Analysis : How 'gay marriage' won in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington
We have been saying this all along including our post election day response last week.
Now another truthful non-profit says it too.
Public Advocate has used low budget high impact messages costing a small fraction of the giant budgets spent by the massive gay lobbies -- sometimes just pennies to their multi-millions of dollars.
But if other groups do not care to use our tactics or if other pro-family groups do not speak forcefully on behalf of the American family, they will meet with limited success.
Mass Resistance says:
These races (Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Washington) were lost for the same reasons:Our side was enormously outspent and out-organized,along with a phalanx of other forces enumerated above.
Furthermore, the groups running the campaign opposing gay marriage had an arsenal of weapons about homosexuality, homosexual behavior, and the destructive nature of homosexual relationships that they didn't use because it would not be "politically correct" and would likely anger the liberal media -- and because it wouldn't be seen as "nice." And when they finally were willing to use the very effective issue of schools forcing homosexuality on kids, it was too late.
Voters are now so dumbed down and are constantly fed a twisted view of church and religion by the media and academia. They don't examine issues but follow emotional and often illogical propaganda. So the verdict often comes out: "Everybody should be happy. Leave it up to God. My nephew's gay, so it should be legal."
It's not surprising that they are already talking about using these campaigns as a template for "turning over" other states one by one. And of course, they are also focused on overturning DOMA.
Nevertheless, we are still confident of the future."
That is the end of the quote. We are also still confident about the future.